home contact us site map
EMERGENCY contact
email this page register with RSPCA  
RSPCA Poll
Do you have pet insurance for your pet? 
Yes I have RSPCA pet insurance 
Yes I have pet insurance with another provider 
No but I would consider purchasing pet insurance in the future 
No and I wouldn't consider purchasing pet insurance 
Live Export
Live export standards
Handle with Care  The Issues  History  The Evidence  Live export standards  Viable alternatives  What YOU can do  Send an RSPCA ecard!

Australian Livestock Export Standards – a flawed process

In early 2006, Meat & Livestock Australia (MLA) published a report World livestock export standards: A comparison of development, processes, systems and outcomes achieved. As a consequence of the information provided in this report, the livestock export industry now claims that Australia has world’s best-practice standards in the export of livestock.

RSPCA Australia believes that the controversial livestock export trade is fraught with serious animal welfare issues and, in 2007, sought to investigate the validity of the claims presented in the MLA report. The result is our own analysis Australian livestock export standards – a flawed process, a thorough assessment which concludes that the MLA report is neither good quality nor unbiased and has fundamentally invalid conclusions that are not supported by the findings in the report itself.

For example, specific problems identified with the Australian Standards for the Export of Livestock (ASEL) which were not identified in the MLA report, include:

  • The majority of Standards are effectively unenforceable under current legislation
  • Many Standards require things that are not measurable or amenable to regulation
  • Exemptions from Standards are permitted with no requirement for justification
  • There is no overall lack of transparency, reporting and feedback in the export process
  • Loopholes in the Standards mean that not all animals are covered

Furthermore, we identified serious flaws with the development process for the ASEL, including:

  • The Livestock Exports Standards Advisory Committee (LESAC) does not give due consideration to regulation and enforcement of the Standards
  • LESAC is expected to make complex scientific assessments without access to all of the relevant data
  • The composition of the Technical Working Group (TWG) is inadequate to address animal welfare questions

Without addressing these issues, there is little hope that the welfare of exported livestock (while still in Australia and on-board the sea vessels) can be adequately protected. In addition, the frequent poor handling, transport and slaughter of Australian animals in importing countries merely strengthens our position that this unnecessary trade must end.

Click here to access the RSPCA report.

What you can do to help

Make your voice heard! Write to the Australian Government Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, your State or Territory Primary Industry / Agriculture Minister, your local MP and to local newspapers (click here for the contact details of major newspapers). Express your opposition to the live export of animals for slaughter.

When writing your letter, feel free to use any of the information provided on our website. Your letter will have even more impact if you keep it focused on why banning live exports matters to you. It’s the personal touch that counts!

See the Media Releases section for more information.
 
Have your say and help the RSPCA in its campaign against the cruel live export trade – click here to sign our petition.

Use of this website is conditional upon your acceptance and compliance with certain Terms and Conditions.  Please click here .Copyright © RSPCA Australia